Everything you need to screen on evidence.
A connected set of assessments, interview kits and analytics — delivered as a service, mapped to one rubric per role.
Skills tests
Job-simulating tasks graded on fixed criteria — spreadsheets, SQL, writing, support scenarios, data cleaning and more.
Coding & technical assessment
Language-agnostic coding challenges, take-home work samples and live technical exercises with objective scoring guides.
Psychometric & aptitude
Validated reasoning, numerical, verbal and situational-judgement measures that don't reward résumé polish.
Structured interview kits
Pre-built question sets with anchored rating scales and shared scorecards, so panels rate the same things the same way.
Proctored assessments
Configurable proctoring, time controls and plagiarism / similarity signals to keep results credible at scale.
Hiring analytics
Funnel metrics, score distributions, predictive-validity tracking and adverse-impact monitoring, reported back to your team.
We run it, you decide.
You don't have to build an assessment function to screen like one. TameOwl designs the rubric, assembles the assessments, administers them, and delivers ranked scorecards — you keep every hiring decision.
- Rubric design tailored to the role's real requirements.
- Assessment assembly from skills, coding, aptitude and interview modules.
- Administration & proctoring handled end-to-end.
- Scored, ranked shortlists with the evidence attached.
One rubric. Weighted, anchored, versioned.
A simplified example rubric for a mid-level role. Weights, anchors and thresholds are set with your team before a single candidate is assessed.
| Competency | Assessment | Weight | Anchor (5 = exemplary) | Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core technical skill | Coding assessment | 30% | Correct, efficient, well-structured solution | ≥ 3.5 |
| Problem decomposition | Work sample | 20% | Breaks the problem down and justifies trade-offs | ≥ 3.0 |
| Reasoning / aptitude | Psychometric | 15% | Strong numerical & logical reasoning | ≥ 3.0 |
| Communication | Structured interview | 20% | Clear, concise, adapts to the listener | ≥ 3.0 |
| Role motivation & fit-to-work | Structured interview | 15% | Concrete, role-relevant motivation | ≥ 2.5 |
Illustrative rubric — competencies, weights and thresholds are defined per engagement.