How an engagement works

From open role to evidence-based shortlist.

Four stages, one rubric, and a scored shortlist you can defend to anyone who asks "why this candidate?"

STEP 01

Define the role rubric

We work with your team to name the competencies that actually predict success, pick assessments for each, and set weights, anchors and thresholds — before anyone is tested.

STEP 02

Assess at scale

Candidates take the same role-relevant assessments under the same conditions, with proctoring and time controls where they matter. The pipeline size stops being a bottleneck.

STEP 03

Score consistently

Every candidate is scored against the identical rubric, with anchored scales that make two reviewers comparable. No candidate is judged on a criterion another wasn't.

STEP 04

Evidence-based shortlist

You get a ranked shortlist with each candidate's scorecard and the evidence behind it — so interview time goes to the people the data already supports.

Metrics that matter

We report the numbers hiring never used to have.

Screening becomes a measured process. These are the metrics we track and hand back for each engagement.

Predictive validity

How well assessment scores relate to the outcomes you care about — tracked over time so the rubric keeps earning its place.

Selection consistency

Inter-rater agreement and score stability — proof that the process gives the same candidate the same result regardless of who reviews.

Time-to-shortlist

How long it takes to turn a raw pipeline into a ranked, defensible shortlist. Consistent scoring is what compresses the weeks.

Bias & adverse-impact reduction

Monitoring for score gaps across groups, so a fairer process is something you can demonstrate, not just claim.

What you get back

A ranked shortlist, with the receipts.

Each candidate arrives with a composite score, a per-competency breakdown and a clear advance / hold recommendation against the thresholds you set. The panel walks in already knowing what to probe.

  • Composite & percentile for fast, comparable ranking.
  • Per-competency scores tied back to the rubric.
  • Threshold verdicts — advance, hold or decline, with reasons.
Ranked shortlist
Role · Data Analyst
Top 3
Candidate A90
Candidate B84
Candidate C79
Candidate D66
Candidate E58
Thresholdadvance ≥ 70 · consistent scoring
Illustrative — anonymised, not real candidates.

Start with one role.

We'll build the rubric and run the first shortlist end-to-end.